Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 41 post(s) |

Josef Djugashvilis
2545
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
John McCreedy wrote:If you want people to move back to null sec and improve the life of people who dwell there, nerfing logistics is not the way to go about it. Jump-based travel is not exclusive to the large alliances with monstrous Capital and Super Capital fleets. Rather, it's used primarily as a logistics tool by Jump Freighters for seeding markets locally so that we don't have to go to market hubs where every Tom, Richard and Harry who has declared war on us is sitting in wait.
Jump Fatigue will do nothing to stop Super Cap blobbing or Capital Hot Dropping because any commander worth his salt is going to factor it in to their pre-engagement planning. People will just base those fleets nearer to the source in order to avoid Jump Fatigue. If it takes a bit longer to move sub-Cap fleets through multiple Titan bridges fleets will either jump from a closer distance or fleets will form up earlier to compensate for Jump Fatigue. You achieve nothing by doing this other than to annoy the very people who live there.
All this will achieve will be to further drive people from null sec and back to Empire where you can find more entertaining PvP, make more ISK and have easier logistics. At the very least I would suggest that Jump Freighters are given a role bonus of -100% Jump Fatigue and are exempt from the Jump Range nerf. Eve will still feel bigger than it does now without damaging null sec economies with ill thought-out nerfs to logistics.
I rather suspect that the first paragraph of your post may well be seen by CCP (and others) as an argument in favour of the proposed changes. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2546
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 20:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
This thread is getting to the point where more folk are 'threatening' to quit than the game has players. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2546
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 20:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Balzaamon wrote:Jump Freighters with 5LY limit? Really?
How someone, who lives in Stain will get to Jita with no docking rights in Catch/Providence???
Simple: he dont get to Jita with 5LY JF. Oh wait, he can jump to system on route and dont dock, wait to cool down timer on cyno, but wait, theres no cloak on JF...
Also it affects other frontier regions like Period Basis/Feythabolis and many more.
Another knife in the back for smaller alliances without sov, keep it up.
Perhaps new player made regional markets will be developed.
And Jita will become just a local hub This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2549
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Will these proposed changed kill Jita as the main trading hub?
It would help if CCP were to show all of the longer term proposed changes to null so that folk may be able to see the 'instant travel nerf' as part of the larger picture - narrative.
From what I can see, it will mean that Eve will consist many local fiefdoms rather than anyone 'owning' vast tracts of space.
Perhaps if those who are totally opposed to these changes suggested by CCP were to get together and suggest a comprehensive set of counter proposals to CCP they might well consider them. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2549
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 11:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
javer wrote:congratulations ccp you just had 4 less paying accounts to your name and keep on sticking your head into the excrement and you can have 0 paying customers at the end
Not so my good sir.
I for one will not quit over these proposed changes. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2550
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 11:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Phoebe = NEW Eden
For good or bad. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2551
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 18:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
[quote=FatFreddy]I LIKE IT
Josef Djugashvilis
2551
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 07:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Viceversa wrote:Is CCP going to make deep null sec as wasted land? After that 5ly nerf on caps, there are some regions you never can't be without using regional gates.
Hoping there'll be no cloakie neuts.
Even if all the folk who have threatened to quit do so and the rest leave null, it will not become a wasteland as others will move in to take advantage of the new opportunities.
This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2551
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 08:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rudina wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote: Put bluntly, a lone new player has no business being in sov-nullsec. He should get with a corp. In a corp, not having a dude or two with a completed 3 month train is not an excuse.
So what you're saying is solo play is not allowed, what happened to the sandbox?
Solo play is allowed, but it has disadvantages, and so it should.
I am a solo player. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2554
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 14:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
remus wulf wrote: What cap pilot in their right mind is going to risk billions of isk to use gates ? Come on seriously people.
So, the null-sec tough guys who scorn the hi-sec 'care-bears' for being risk averse, are not so tough after all. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2558
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 19:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:To all the goons and CFC still crying over this:
CCP is not trying to ruin the game, they are trying to ruin your game.
Made me smile.
I am so pleased to see goonies coming to the support of the pubbies they so despise.
This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2561
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 05:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
CCP have foot - stomped the stagnant null-sec puddle.
Whatever happens now, at least it will be interesting.
With the greatest respect for those who have spent the time to train Titans etc, your days of hot dropping cruisers on the far side if the universe are over.
It may well be the case that the game gains more players, both in total, and in null-sec than will actually rage quit as a consequence of the changes.
I look forward to further announcements on the proposed changes to null. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2563
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 21:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
If, as they say they have, the null-sec folk have already worked out how to counter CCP's proposals, why is this thread so full of null-sec folk threatening to quit all their X number of accounts?
Surely being unable to hot drop cruisers on the other side of the Eve universe is not worth rage quitting over.
I would suggest that folk reserve judgment until CCP reveal the rest of their plans for null-sec.
Then, as with all the changes CCP make, folk can at least threaten to rage quit with all the facts at hand. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2564
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 07:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kun'ii Zenya wrote:And I'm going to go there, Greyscale is a freaking moron.
If I had 1 wish, it would be that he would be summarily fired from CCP. If I had 2, he'd be fired and then neutered so his stupidity would be prevented from continuing on.
Give me 3 wishes, and his entire genetic history would be removed from all of history.
Hmm, CCP will probably be pleased if you rage quit.
To strongly disagree with the current proposals is one thing, to simply insult the staff is just foolish. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2565
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 08:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:Hmmm, the thread slowed down. Seems the CFC whine train ran out of steam, perhaps they just ran out of tears to shed. Have a closer look at who is posting, very few goons are against this, you know why, because it benefits them more then anybody else. They have the manpower to cope with the changes. They have the Capital ships to defend their home systems, they have the isk to seed system after system with carriers and dreads and they are going to have even more isk after these changes.
From Chribba:
http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/376666-1
Your welcome. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2570
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 12:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/YA0-XJ
Station is named "CCP Fire Greyscale"
Something tells me they're butthurt...
Actually, alot of GSF stations has been renamed to that... Goons won't at all be affected by these changes, in fact they'll just grow stronger. They also aren't posting in this thread crying their eyes out.
From Chribba:
http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/376666-1 This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2570
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 13:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:You guys really make me laugh..
CFC have proved time and time again that they can quite easily win engagements without the use of Capital Ships.
Hell only yesterday they obliterated a nulli BS Fleet worth 36bil using bombers.
I really can not wait until a few weeks after this patch to see all the people laughing now saying this will really hurt the likes of CFC / NC / PL only to realise it has just made things worse.
You are so sweet 
If the goonies etc adapt well, then good for them.
It does not mean that they are happy with the proposed changes - why else the constant refrain of: I'm going to quit with my zillions of accounts in this thread? This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2570
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 18:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:I think people raged themselves into submission. The thread is slowing down.
The quitters have done gone and quit  This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2570
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 18:44:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vagris wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:I think people raged themselves into submission. The thread is slowing down. The quitters have done gone and quit  No characters left? all biomassed?
I very much doubt the vast majority of the 'quitters' actually bio-massed.
I see the whole - me and my zillion alts are quitting - as a not very subtle attempt to get CCP to back off and to continue to allow folk to use Titans etc to hot-drop cruisers on the far side of the universe.
Only time will tell if CCP have taken the right path.
This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2571
|
Posted - 2014.10.07 07:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
Summary:
Hot dropping cruisers on the other side of the universe - nerfed
Eve Online, as a game - buffed This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2576
|
Posted - 2014.10.07 13:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
Time, is of the essence... This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2578
|
Posted - 2014.10.08 08:11:00 -
[22] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Just as i halfway through jump calibration 5... Thanks for wasting my time again CCP.
Time penalty based fatigue is bad game design in my opinion. If the issue is force projection then simply limit projection without making jumpdrives a pointless mechanic.
Leave the base jump range the way it is but after a jump, reduce the max jump range. That would limit projection but wouldn't make jumpdrives pointless or force people to log off due to unreasonable fatigue.
Use the gates. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2578
|
Posted - 2014.10.08 11:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:So, after 7,700 posts, I guess CCP will just implement without changes? I mean, since it is such a simple and straight forward change, and everyone is in agreement. And I'm sure the CSM has now discussed ALL the changes, for more than 12 hours, since you didn't talk about 50% of this dev blog with them beforehand. This has now had more debate than when T20 magicked T2 BPOs into existence. Maybe you guys could just do that instead.  But don't worry guys! They'll modify it to 'fix' it after it goes live. Just like Dominion Sov. And that door on your captains quarters. And POSes. and Super's ewar immunity. And anomalies. And war decs. And Faction Warfare. And heavy missiles. And the half a dozen hulls that nobody uses. And the blue donut. Oh wait, this is the fix for that, right? Yeah, totally trust they're going to fix this post patch.
Do keep up dearie, your leadership seems to be quite happy with the proposed changes. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2578
|
Posted - 2014.10.08 17:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
Alex Sn0w wrote:8 months learned skills a character specifically for Thanatos, without this patch carriers is rarely used, now I think I can safely delete this character. Do you really think that jumping from the gate to the gate most interesting exercise in Eve?
Google translation
Many of us, in fact the majority of players manage just fine going gate to gate.
Well, apart from getting ganked at gates...
Thank you. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
2578
|
Posted - 2014.10.09 09:53:00 -
[25] - Quote
Polo Marco wrote:mistyped
The thread in general, or a mistype by you? This is not a signature. |
|
|